Given the short 14C half-life
of 5730 years, organic materials purportedly older than 250,000 years,
corresponding to 43.6 half-lives, should contain absolutely no detectable
14C. (One gram of modern carbon contains about 6 x 1010
14C atoms, and 43.6 half-lives should reduce that number
by a factor of 7.3 x 10-14.)
An astonishing discovery made over the past twenty years is that,
almost without exception, when tested by highly sensitive accelerator
mass spectrometer (AMS) methods, organic samples from every portion
of the Phanerozoic record show detectable amounts of 14C!
14C/C ratios from all but the youngest Phanerozoic
samples appear to be clustered in the range 0.1-0.5 pmc (percent modern
carbon), regardless of geological ‘age.’ A straightforward conclusion
that can be drawn from these observations is that all but the very youngest
Phanerozoic organic material was buried contemporaneously much less
than 250,000 years ago. This is consistent with the Biblical account of a global Flood that
destroyed most of the air-breathing life on the planet in a single brief
cataclysm only a few thousand years ago.
INTRODUCTION
Giem [18] reviewed the literature
and tabulated about seventy reported AMS measurements of 14C
in organic materials from the geologic record that, according to the
conventional geologic time-scale, should be 14C ‘dead.’ The surprising result is that organic samples from every portion
of the Phanerozoic record show detectable amounts of 14C. For the measurements considered most reliable,
the 14C/C ratios appear to fall in the range 0.1-0.5 percent
of the modern 14C/C ratio (percent modern carbon, or pmc).
Giem demonstrates instrument error can be eliminated as an explanation
on experimental grounds. He shows contamination of the 14C-bearing
fossil material in situ is unlikely but theoretically possible
and is a testable hypothesis, while contamination during sample preparation
is a genuine problem but largely solved by two decades of improvement
in laboratory procedures. He
concludes the 14C detected in these samples most likely is
from the organisms from which the samples are derived.
Moreover, because most fossil carbon seems to have roughly the
same 14C/C ratio, Giem deems it plausible that all these
organisms resided on earth at the same time.
Anomalous
14C in fossil material actually has been reported from the
earliest days of radiocarbon dating. Whitelaw [46], for example,
surveyed all the dates reported in the journal Radiocarbon up
to 1970, and he commented that for all of the over 15,000 specimens
reported, "All such matter is found datable within 50,000 years
as published." The specimens included coal, oil, natural
gas, and other allegedly ancient material. The reason these anomalies
were not taken seriously is because the older beta-decay counting technique
had difficulty distinguishing genuine low levels of 14C in
the samples from background counts due to cosmic rays.
The AMS method, besides its inherently greater sensitivity, does
not have this complication of spurious counts due to cosmic rays. In retrospect, it is likely that many of the
beta-counting analyses were indeed truly detecting intrinsic 14C.
Measurable 14C in pre-Flood
organic materials fossilized in Flood strata therefore appears to represent
a powerful and testable confirmation of the young earth Creation-Flood
model. It was on this basis
that Snelling [37-41] analyzed the 14C content of fossilized
wood conventionally regarded as 14C ‘dead’ because it was
derived from Tertiary, Mesozoic, and upper Paleozoic strata having conventional
radioisotope ages of 40 to 250 million years.
All samples were analyzed using AMS technology by a reputable
commercial laboratory with some duplicate samples also tested by a specialist
laboratory in a major research institute.
Measurable 14C was obtained in all cases.
Values ranged from 7.58+1.11 pmc for a lower Jurassic
sample to 0.38+0.04 pmc for a middle Tertiary sample (corresponding
to 14C ‘ages’ of 20,700+1200 to 44,700+950
years BP, respectively). The d13C values
for the samples clustered around –25‰, as expected for organic carbon
in plants and wood. The 14C
measured in these fossilized wood samples does not conform to a simple
pattern, however, such as constant or decreasing with increasing depth
in the geologic record (increasing conventional age).
On the contrary, the middle Tertiary sample yielded the least
14C, while the Mesozoic and upper Paleozoic samples did not
contain similar 14C levels as might be expected if these
represent pre-Flood trees. The issue then of how uniformly the 14C
may have been distributed in the pre-Flood world we concluded would
likely be an important one. Therefore,
our RATE team decided to undertake further 14C analyses on
a new set of samples to address this issue as well as to confirm the
remarkable 14C levels reported in the radiocarbon literature
for Phanerozoic material.
14C MEASURED
IN SAMPLES CONVENTIONALLY DATED OLDER THAN 100,000 YEARS
Giem [18] compiled a long list of
AMS measurements made on samples that, based on their conventional geological
age, should be 14C ‘dead.’
These measurements were performed in many different laboratories
around the world and reported in the standard peer-reviewed literature,
mostly in the journals Radiocarbon and Nuclear Instruments
and Methods in Physics Research B.
Despite the fact that the conventional uniformitarian age for
these samples is well beyond 100,000 years (in most cases it is tens
to hundreds of millions of years), it is helpful nonetheless to be able
to translate 14C/C ratios into the equivalent uniformitarian
14C age under the standard uniformitarian assumptions of
an approximately constant 14C production rate and an approximately
constant biospheric carbon inventory, extrapolated into the indefinite
past. This conversion is given
by the simple formula, pmc = 100 x 2–t/5730, where t is the
time in years. Applying this
formula, one obtains values of 0.79 pmc for t = 40,000 years, 0.24 for
t = 50,000 years, 0.070 pmc for 60,000 years, 0.011 pmc for 75,000 years,
and .001 pmc for 95,000 years, as shown in graphical form in Figure
1.
|
|
Figure
1. Uniformitarian
age as a function of 14C/C ratio in percent modern
carbon. The uniformitarian approach for interpreting
the 14C data assumes a constant 14C
production rate and a constant biospheric carbon inventory
extrapolated into the indefinite past.
It does not account for the possibility of a recent
global catastrophe that removed a large quantity of carbon
from the biospheric inventory.
|
Table 1 below contains most of Giem’s
[18] data plus data from some more recent papers. Included in the list are a number of samples
from Precambrian, that is, what we consider non-organic pre-Flood settings. Most of the graphite samples with 14C/C
values below 0.05 pmc are in this category.
TABLE 1. AMS Measurements on Samples Conventionally
Deemed 14C ‘Dead’
|
Item
|
14C/C (pmc)
(±1 S.D.)
|
Material
|
Reference
|
|
1
|
0.71±?*
|
Marble
|
Aerts-Bijma et al. [1]
|
|
2
|
0.65±0.04
|
Shell
|
Beukens [8]
|
|
3
|
0.61±0.12
|
Foraminifera
|
Arnold et al. [2]
|
|
4
|
0.60±0.04
|
Commercial graphite
|
Schmidt et al. [36]
|
|
5
|
0.58±0.09
|
Foraminifera (Pyrgo murrhina)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
6
|
0.54±0.04
|
Calcite
|
Beukens [8]
|
|
7
|
0.52±0.20
|
Shell (Spisula subtruncata)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
8
|
0.52±0.04
|
Whale bone
|
Jull et al. [24]
|
|
9
|
0.51±0.08
|
Marble
|
Gulliksen & Thomsen [21]
|
|
10
|
0.5±0.1
|
Wood, 60 Ka
|
Gillespie & Hedges [19]
|
|
11
|
0.46±0.03
|
Wood
|
Beukens [8]
|
|
12
|
0.46±0.03
|
Wood
|
Vogel et al. [45]
|
|
13
|
0.44±0.13
|
Anthracite
|
Vogel et al. [45]
|
|
14
|
0.42±0.03
|
Anthracite
|
Grootes et al. [20]
|
|
15
|
0.401±0.084
|
Foraminifera (untreated)
|
Schleicher et al. [35]
|
|
16
|
0.40±0.07
|
Shell (Turitella communis)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
17
|
0.383±0.045
|
Wood (charred)
|
Snelling [37]
|
|
18
|
0.358±0.033
|
Anthracite
|
Beukens et al. [9]
|
|
19
|
0.35±0.03
|
Shell (Varicorbula gibba)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
20
|
0.342±0.037
|
Wood
|
Beukens et al. [9]
|
|
21
|
0.34±0.11
|
Recycled graphite
|
Arnold et al. [2]
|
|
22
|
0.32±0.06
|
Foraminifera
|
Gulliksen & Thomsen [21]
|
|
23
|
0.3±?
|
Coke
|
Terrasi et al. [43]
|
|
24
|
0.3±?
|
Coal
|
Schleicher et al. [35]
|
|
25
|
0.26±0.02
|
Marble
|
Schmidt et al. [36]
|
|
26
|
0.2334±0.061
|
Carbon powder
|
McNichol et al. [29]
|
|
27
|
0.23±0.04
|
Foraminifera (mixed species avg.)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
28
|
0.211±0.018
|
Fossil wood
|
Beukens [8]
|
|
29
|
0.21±0.02
|
Marble
|
Schmidt et al. [36]
|
|
30
|
0.21±0.06
|
CO2
|
Grootes et al. [20]
|
|
31
|
0.20–0.35*
(range)
|
Anthracite
|
Aerts-Bijma et al. [1]
|
|
32
|
0.20±0.04
|
Shell (Ostrea edulis)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
33
|
0.20±0.04
|
Shell (Pecten opercularis)
|
Nadeau et al. [30]
|
|
34
|
0.2±0.1*
|
Calcite
|
Donahue et al. [15]
|
|
35
|
0.198±0.060
|
Carbon powder
|
McNichol et al. [29]
|
|
36
|
0.18±0.05 (range?)
|
Marble
|
Van der Borg et al. [44]
|
|
37
|
0.18±0.03
|
Whale bone
|
Gulliksen & Thomsen [21]
|
|
38
|
0.18±0.03
|
Calcite
|
Gulliksen & Thomsen [21]
|
|
39
|
0.18±0.01**
|
Anthracite
|
Nelson et al. [32]
|
|
|